Difference between revisions of "Lecture 3."
(→Magnetic Vector Potential) |
(→Magnetic Vector Potential) |
||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
<math>\nabla\times\vec{E}=-\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \left(\nabla\times\vec{A}\right)=-\nabla\times\lft(\frac{\partial\vec{A}}{\partial t}\right) \to \nabla\times\left(\vec{E}+\frac{\partial\vec{A}}{\partial t}\right)=\vec{0}\</math>, | <math>\nabla\times\vec{E}=-\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \left(\nabla\times\vec{A}\right)=-\nabla\times\lft(\frac{\partial\vec{A}}{\partial t}\right) \to \nabla\times\left(\vec{E}+\frac{\partial\vec{A}}{\partial t}\right)=\vec{0}\</math>, | ||
− | because rotation (i.e. derivative by space) and derivation by time can be replaced. The curl-less vector field <math>\vec{E}+\partial\vec{A}/\partial t</math> can be derived from the so-called electric scalar potential <math>V</math> (<math>\nabla\times\nabla\varphi\equiv0</math>, for any scalar function <math>\ | + | because rotation (i.e. derivative by space) and derivation by time can be replaced. The curl-less vector field <math>\vec{E}+\partial\vec{A}/\partial t</math> can be derived from the so-called electric scalar potential <math>V</math> (<math>\nabla\times\nabla\varphi\equiv0</math>, for any scalar function <math>\varphi=\varphi(\vec{r})</math>, or <math>\varphi=\varphi(\vec{r},t)</math>), |
<math>\vec{E}+\frac{\partial\vec{A}}{\partial t}=-\nabla V</math>, | <math>\vec{E}+\frac{\partial\vec{A}}{\partial t}=-\nabla V</math>, |
Revision as of 08:05, 13 March 2019
Coupled Finite Element Method / Time-Dependent Magnetic Field | |
Instructor
|
Teaching Assistants:
|
Contents
Csatolt végeselem-módszer (FEM)
Quasistatic Electromagnetic Field
The most important case for electromagnetic equipment (sensors, actuators, motors, etc.) is the quasistatic case often referred to as the eddy current or magnetodynamic case. For quasistatic electromagnetic field we can neglect the displacement current density term [math]\partial \vec{D}/\partial t[/math], which gives Maxwell's equations to the following form
[math]\nabla\times\vec{H}=\vec{J}[/math]
Ampere's law,
[math]\nabla\times\vec{E}=-\frac{\partial \vec{B}}{\partial t}[/math]
Faraday's law,
[math]\nabla\cdot\vec{B}(\vec{r},t)=0[/math]
Gauss's law (magnetic).
Magnetic Vector Potential
According to [math]\nabla\cdot\vec{B}(\vec{r},t)=0[/math] the magnetic flux density is conservative and therefore can be described by the curl of a vector
[math] \vec{B} = \nabla\times\vec{A}[/math],
where [math]\vec{A}[/math] is the magnetic vector potential [Wb/m]. Substituting this expression into Faraday's law results in
[math]\nabla\times\vec{E}=-\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \left(\nabla\times\vec{A}\right)=-\nabla\times\lft(\frac{\partial\vec{A}}{\partial t}\right) \to \nabla\times\left(\vec{E}+\frac{\partial\vec{A}}{\partial t}\right)=\vec{0}\[/math],
because rotation (i.e. derivative by space) and derivation by time can be replaced. The curl-less vector field [math]\vec{E}+\partial\vec{A}/\partial t[/math] can be derived from the so-called electric scalar potential [math]V[/math] ([math]\nabla\times\nabla\varphi\equiv0[/math], for any scalar function [math]\varphi=\varphi(\vec{r})[/math], or [math]\varphi=\varphi(\vec{r},t)[/math]),
[math]\vec{E}+\frac{\partial\vec{A}}{\partial t}=-\nabla V[/math],
and the [math]\vec{E}[/math] electric field intensity vector can be described by two potentials as
[math]\vec{E}=-\frac{\partial\vec{A}}{\partial t}-\nabla V[/math].