Difference between revisions of "Lecture 3."
(→Coupled Finite Element Method) |
|||
Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
− | == | + | == References == |
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} |
Revision as of 21:47, 14 March 2019
Coupled Finite Element Method / Time-Dependent Magnetic Field | |
Instructor
|
Teaching Assistants:
|
Contents
Coupled Finite Element Method
Rigid Body Motion
In electromechanical systems (electric machines, actuators, etc.), the structure is subject to a rigid motion by means of the force and torque. Thus, the change on the geometry, in turn, may strongly influence the magnetic field. Further, due to the motion and time-varying magnetic field, eddy currents are generated in the conducting parts. The so-called induced current (eddy current) in an electrically conductive body
- [math]\vec{J}_{M} = \sigma\vec{v}\times\vec{B}[/math],
where [math]\vec{v}[/math] is the velocity of the body.
Electric Circuit Coupling
Quasistatic Electromagnetic Field
The most important case for electromagnetic equipment (sensors, actuators, motors, etc.) is the quasistatic case often referred to as the eddy current or magnetodynamic case. For quasistatic electromagnetic field we can neglect the displacement current density term [math]\partial \vec{D}/\partial t[/math], which gives Maxwell's equations to the following form
[math]\nabla\times\vec{H}=\vec{J}[/math]
Ampere's law,
[math]\nabla\times\vec{E}=-\frac{\partial \vec{B}}{\partial t}[/math]
Faraday's law,
[math]\nabla\cdot\vec{B}(\vec{r},t)=0[/math]
Gauss's law (magnetic).
Magnetic Vector Potential and Electric Scalar Potential
According to [math]\nabla\cdot\vec{B}(\vec{r},t)=0[/math] the magnetic flux density is conservative and therefore can be described by the curl of a vector
- [math] \vec{B} = \nabla\times\vec{A}[/math],
where [math]\vec{A}[/math] is the magnetic vector potential [Wb/m]. Substituting this expression into Faraday's law results in
- [math]\nabla\times\vec{E}=-\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \left(\nabla\times\vec{A}\right)=-\nabla\times\left(\frac{\partial\vec{A}}{\partial t}\right) \to \nabla\times\left(\vec{E}+\frac{\partial\vec{A}}{\partial t}\right)=\vec{0}[/math],
because rotation (i.e. derivative by space) and derivation by time can be replaced. The curl-less vector field [math]\vec{E}+\partial\vec{A}/\partial t[/math] can be derived from the so-called electric scalar potential [math]V[/math] ([math]\nabla\times\nabla\varphi\equiv0[/math], for any scalar function [math]\varphi=\varphi(\vec{r})[/math], or [math]\varphi=\varphi(\vec{r},t)[/math]),
- [math]\vec{E}+\frac{\partial\vec{A}}{\partial t}=-\nabla V[/math],
and the [math]\vec{E}[/math] electric field intensity vector can be described by two potentials as
- [math]\vec{E}=-\frac{\partial\vec{A}}{\partial t}-\nabla V[/math].
Substituting expression of [math]\vec{B}[/math] and [math]\vec{E}[/math] into Faraday's law leads to the partial differential equation
- [math]\nabla\times\left(\frac{1}{\mu}\nabla\times\vec{A}\right)=\vec{J}_{S}-\frac{\partial\vec{A}}{\partial t}-\nabla V+\sigma\vec{v}\times\nabla\times\vec{A}[/math].
If the velocity is a priori known, the additional term remains linear but will lead to a so-called convective term. Therefore, numerical computation will need some upwind technique for stability reasons.