Difference between revisions of "Lecture 4. - Assignment"

From Maxwell
Jump to: navigation, search
(Evaluation of results)
(Evaluation of results)
Line 73: Line 73:
 
[[File:PMMotor RelativePermeability.png|300px]]
 
[[File:PMMotor RelativePermeability.png|300px]]
 
| align=center |
 
| align=center |
[[File:CableHarsness EField.gif|300px]]
+
[[File:CableHarsness EField.gif|400px]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|align=center | <span style="font-size:88%;">''' ''Fig. 1'' - The core loss and its components in the function of time.'''</span>
 
|align=center | <span style="font-size:88%;">''' ''Fig. 1'' - The core loss and its components in the function of time.'''</span>

Revision as of 14:57, 27 March 2019

Cable Harness Analysis

VehicleCables.jpg

CableHarsness.gif

Whole wiring of a vehicle. The magnetic field intensity in the wire and in the car body. [Click to see animation.]

Instructor

  • Dániel Marcsa (lecturer)
  • Lectures: Monday, 14:50 - 16:25 (D201), 16:30 - 17:15 (D105)
  • Office hours: by request

Teaching Assistants:

  • -
  • Office hours: -.

Purpose of the Assignment

The geometry of the problem with the yellow cable harness.
The geometry of the problem with the yellow cable harness.

The student will learn the main steps of the finite element method, such as preparing the model (creating or importing geometry), specifying material parameters, boundary conditions, and excitation through a full-wave problem. This example gives a brief insight into the cable harness analysis through an automotive example.

Knowledge needed to solve the problem

  • The steps of the finite element method;
  • Theoretical knowledge of full-wave fields (for defining materials, excitation);
  • Basic knowledge of electric network theory.

Steps to solve the problem

After launching ANSYS Electronics Desktop, open the file CableHarness_Example.aedt using the File [math] \to [/math] Open menu.
To use ANSYS 2D Extractor, ANSYS HFSS and ANSYS Circuit, the Help menu and YouTube videos provide a lot of help.

Defining the Problem

A possible discreatization of the problem.
A possible discreatization of the problem.

In this case, the geometry and definitions/settings of the problem are pre-defined. The reason for this is to avoid lengthy setup and basically, the purpose of the example is to look at sources of unwanted phenomena (force, loss) as an example of a rotating electric machine.

Before and during the run, we briefly review the settings of the problem.

It is important to note that in the previous two examples, adaptive meshing used. However, in the case of a time-dependent (transient) problem, it is not possible to use the adaptive mesh, so we need to define the discretization of the problem with different mesh operations.

Sett up the solver, run the simulation

At the solver, the end of the time interval of calculation should be defined as well as the time step. In this example, the end time is 15 ms (Stop time) and 0.05 ms (100 time steps per period) is the time step.

You may also need to set the nonlinear solver, because the [math] {B} - {H} [/math] relation of the stator and rotor steel is nonlinear. In this case, the relative permeability is space dependent, as you can see in Fig. 1.

In order to plot the result at several time instants, it is necessary to specify in which time step we want to save the solution. If we do not do this, the last time step is saved automatically, so the field quantities ([math]\vec{A}; \vec{B}; \vec{H}[/math]; ...) or other derived quantities ([math] \text{loss}, \text{energy}, ... [/math]) can be plot in this instance.

Evaluation of results

The purpose of this example is to illustrate the source of undesirable phenomena in electric machines. The source of the heat is the loss in the various parts of the machine. We have already met with the eddy current loss in the previous lecture. However, the so-called electric steels has more components for core loss

[math] p_{\text{vas}} = p_{\text{h}} + p_{\text{c}} + p_{\text{e}} = K_{\text{h}}f(B_{\text{max}})^2 + K_{\text{c}}(f B_{\text{max}})^2 + K_{\text{e}}(f B_{\text{max}})^{1.5} [/math],

where [math]p_{\text{h}}[/math] is the hysteresis loss, [math]p_{\text{c}}[/math] is the eddy current loss, [math]p_{\text{e}}[/math] is the excess loss, [math]K_{\text{h}}, K_{\text{c}}, K_{\text{e}}[/math] is the coefficient of losses, [math]f[/math] is the frequency and [math]B_{\text{m}}[/math] is the maximum of magnetic flux density. Fig. 1 shows the core loss and its components as a function of time.

The other main undesirable phenomenon is the vibration of electric machines. Here, we only deal with the main electromagnetic source of the vibration, the air-gap flux density, which differs from pure sinus, so it has harmonic content (harmonic content hardly depend on the design of machine). According to the Maxwell stress tensor, the tensile force (radial force magnitude) acting on the stator and on the rotor surface is proportional to the square of the normal component of the air-gap flux density. The Maxwell stress tensor can be calculated with the following relationship

[math]\vec{\sigma} = \frac{1}{\mu_0}\left(\vec{B}\cdot\vec{n}\right)\vec{B} - \frac{1}{2\mu_0}B^2\vec{n}[/math],

where [math]B = \|\vec{B}\|[/math] is the absolut value of magnetic flux density. Fig. 3 shows the force acting on the stator teeth.

PMMotor CoreLossResults.png

PMMotor RelativePermeability.png

CableHarsness EField.gif

Fig. 1 - The core loss and its components in the function of time. Fig. 2 - The relative permeability in the stator and rotor core. Fig. 3 - The variation of teeth force as a function of time. [Click to see animation.]

References